75 thoughts on “Slime Performance Test

  1. Res

    40
    23
    15
    18
    60
    24
    56
    20

    I have a bit of a slow laptop anyway 😛
    Windows 8, using google chrome. most often times, i have to choose medium just to be able to play EBF without it being super slow. using the attack command takes about 6 full seconds to attack and return to position, if that gives you any idea 🙂

    Best of luck! 😀

    Reply
  2. Shadowlord13

    Rough average ~
    1. 40
    2. 22
    3. 14
    4. 16
    5. 60
    6. 17
    7. 60
    8. 14
    –//My laptop
    TOSHIBA
    Model Satellite L505D
    System type 64-bit operating system
    Number of processor cores 2

    Reply
  3. Slime tester

    Processor: Intel i5 3350p (3.10 Ghz, 4 cores)
    Graphics: Radeon HD 7790
    OS: Windows 7-64 bit
    RAM: 8,0 GB
    Browser: Firefox

    1 60fps
    2 60fps
    3 56-60ps
    4 60fps
    5 60fps
    6 60fps
    7 60fps
    8 60fps

    Reply
  4. Konda

    1 (60fps), 2 (60fps), 3 (50fps), 4 (58fps), 5 (60fps), 6 (60fps), 7 (60fps), 8 (60fps).
    Laptop, 2.4GHz, (8CPUs)

    Reply
  5. Cpt Fudge

    I am using a Dell workhorse computer it is an optiplex. All of them work smoothly at 60 fps. Kinda expected it would 😐 All of them look good especially the smooth version.

    Reply
  6. Sam

    1. 60 fps
    2. 46/47 fps
    3. 31/32 fps
    4. 38 fps
    5. 60 fps
    6. 50 fps
    7. 60 fps
    8. 42 fps
    System Specs (from control panel):
    Intel Core 2 Quad CPU Q8400 @ 2.66GHz 2.67 GHz
    4GB RAM
    AMD Radeon HD 6800 Series
    Browsing on Chrome

    Hope I helped, really looking forward to the steam release!

    Reply
  7. Mr.Schyzo

    Here’s the other benchmark.

    – Using PC & Browser:
    Type: Desktop
    CPU: AMD Sempron LE-1250 @ ~2.2GHz
    GPU: ATI Radeon HD 4670 w/ 512MB
    Cores: 1
    Browser: Google Chrome

    – Benchmarks:
    Test 1. 58~60 FPS
    Test 2. 34~43 FPS
    Test 3. 11-12 FPS
    Test 4. 12-13 FPS
    Test 5. 60 FPS
    Test 6. 12-13 FPS
    Test 7. 60 FPS
    Test 8. 10-11 FPS

    Reply
  8. Deb Ng

    60fps across the board.
    —-
    Google Chrome
    NVIDIA GEFORCE GT 630M • 2GB
    Laptop, one core, Intel Core i7 @ 2.3GHz
    :smirk:

    Reply
  9. Mr.Schyzo

    This benchmark won’t be so useful. I’ll send another benchmark with my old Desktop!

    – Using PC & Browser:
    Type: Laptop
    CPU: Intel core i7 2670QM
    Cores: 4
    Browser: Google Chrome

    – Benchmarks:
    Test 1. 60 FPS
    Test 2. 60 FPS
    Test 3. 59-60 FPS
    Test 4. 60 FPS
    Test 5. 60 FPS
    Test 6. 60 FPS
    Test 7. 60 FPS
    Test 8. 60 FPS

    Reply
  10. Erer08

    (Single Core) Intel Pentium 4 2.4 GHz

    1 – 25 FPS
    2 – 16 FPS
    3 – 10 FPS
    4 – 11 FPS
    5 – 40 FPS
    6 – 9 FPS
    7 – 39 FPS
    8 – 7 FPS

    Hope it helps! 😀

    Reply
  11. Kkots

    x) On the site FPS / offline FPS
    1) Vector graphics (Low):
    60/60
    2) Vector graphics (Medium):
    36/39
    3) Vector graphics (High):
    22/24
    4) Vector graphics (High) optimized:
    25/28
    5) Bitmapped w/o smoothing:
    60/60
    6) Bitmapped with smoothing:
    30/36
    7) HD bitmapped w/o smoothing:
    60/60
    8) Hd bitmapped with smoothing:
    25/28

    Using a desktop, 2.27 GHz, 2 cores, 32-bit Windows Vista, 4GB RAM.
    Offline mode is done by downloading stand-alone Flash Player for Windows, vers 11.9, and by downloading the swf file

    Then I took my mother’s old laptop (barely works). Here are its specs: 1.83 GHz, 2 cores, 3GB RAM, 32-bit Windows Vista.
    x) online fps/offline fps
    1) 41/40
    2) 22/22
    3) 13/13
    4) 15/15
    5) 60/60
    6) 16/17
    7) 60/60
    8) 13/14

    Then I took my mother’s new laptop. Specs={ cores: 2, threads: 4, clock_speed: “2.30 GHz”, ram: “4 GB”, OS: “Win7”};
    x) online fps/offline fps
    1) 60/60
    2) 55/60
    3) 34/40
    4) 41/47
    5) 60/60
    6) 48/54
    7) 60/60
    8) 42/46

    Also, my brother has a laptop which is moderately old, but he’s sleeping near it, so I’d have to sneak and steal it, but that’s just risky.. I mean, not good for my overall health :skull:

    Reply
  12. Rainy

    desktop:
    1. 18-20 fps
    2. 12-14 fps
    3. 8-9 fps
    4. 9-10 fps
    5. 24-27 fps
    6. 8-9 fps
    7. 22-25 fps
    8. 7-8 fps
    the second value is with plugin-container.exe priority set to above normal
    browser: Firefox Aurora
    processor: AthlonXP @ 2.15GHz
    VGA: Geforce 7600GS
    RAM: 2GB
    OS: WinXP SP3

    laptop:
    1. 10 fps
    2. 6 fps
    3. 4 fps
    4. 5 fps
    5. 16 fps
    6. 4 fps
    7. 14 fps
    8. 4 fps
    browser: QtWeb
    processor: Pentium3 @ 800MHz
    VGA: integrated i830
    RAM: 640MB
    OS: WinXP SP3

    HTH

    Reply
  13. a_sh

    More tests, now on my tablet – Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1: Exynos 4412 (1,4GHz, 4 cores), Android 4.1.2, default browser
    1: 23-26
    2: 16-17
    3: 16-17
    4: 16-18
    5: 41-51 (constantly switching)
    6: 38-41
    7: 40-47
    8: 35-40

    It’s actually better than my netbook, I didn’t expect that :yay:

    Reply
  14. CelestOrion

    Alright, here’s my specs and the results, if it helps you out in the long run.

    Running off of Intel(R) Core i5-2430M CPU @2.4GHz, dual core, video card is Raedon HD 6650M 2GB

    1. 60fps
    2. 60fps
    3. 34fps
    4. 40fps
    5. 60fps
    6. 55fps
    7. 60fps
    8. 45fps

    Reply
  15. a_sh

    I also tried this test on my netbook: AMD E-450 (1.65GHz, 2 cores), Radeon 6320, Ubuntu 13.10, Firefox.
    1: 22
    2: 14
    3: 11
    4: 11
    5: 32-35
    6: 13
    7: 32
    8: 11

    Also, slightly more detaled data on my desktop test: i5-3570K (3.4GHz, 4 cores), intel HD4000, Windows 7 (x86), Chrome
    1-8: 60 without any glitches.

    Reply
  16. omt8

    1. 60 fps
    2. 60 fps
    3. 49 fps
    4. 58 fps
    5. 60 fps
    6. 60 fps
    7. 60 fps
    8. 60 fps

    browser: google chrome
    processor: Intel i5
    RAM: 8GB
    OS: Windows 8 – 64 bit
    desktop computer

    Reply
  17. felix

    ___FPS | CPU_LOAD
    1) 60 30
    2) 47 43
    3) 32 52
    4) 37 50
    5) 60 15
    6) 44 58
    7) 60 15
    8) 37 62
    Computer: Desktop
    Processor: AMD 3cores 3.2GHz each
    Browser: Firefox
    :yay:

    Reply
  18. Arcterran

    Laptop

    From DxDiag:

    Processor: Intel i3 (M350) 2.27 GHZ, Quad Core
    Graphics: Some terrible integrated graphics setup (Listed as “Intel HD graphics” BAH!)
    OS: Windows 7-64 bit
    RAM: 4096MB
    DirectX-11 (if you need that)

    1: 60
    2: 46
    3: 29
    4: 33
    5: 60
    6: 38
    7: 60
    8: 42

    Reply
  19. TheRainSquire

    1: 60
    2: 60
    3: 42
    4: 47
    5: 60
    6: 60
    7: 60
    8: 48 – 60 (Lots of fluctuation, never settles.)

    Chrome, PC, Dual Core 3.1 GHz Processor, AMD Geforce 210 GPU

    Hope this helps!

    Reply
  20. Idea man

    Desktop.Low quality:55-56 fps,medium-34-45 fps,high-20 fps,high(optimized)-20-22 fps,no smoothing-60 fps,with smoothing-9-26 fps,HD no smoothing-11-60 fps,HD with smoothing-20 fps.

    Reply
  21. Marco

    1) 60
    2) 43
    3) 29
    4) 34
    5) 60
    6) 41
    7) 60
    8) 35-36

    Device: Laptop
    OS: Windows 8.1,
    Browser: Chrome
    CPU: Intel Core i3-2328M 2.20GHz (Dual core + hyper-threading)

    Reply
  22. the unknown

    1. 55
    2. 36
    3. 25
    4. 27
    5. 60
    6. 33
    7. 60
    8. 27
    got an core I3 1.8 ghz dual core
    6 gb ram
    nvidia 720m with 2gb dedicated ram

    Reply
  23. El_Nazgir

    Macbook Air, 1.8 GHz intel i5 (I think it’s quad core, not sure, previous generation macbook air, if anyone else knows?)
    8Gb 1600 MHz DDR3 RAM, and intel HD 4000 graphics card 1024Mb
    1) 60
    2) 60
    3) 40
    4) 47
    5) 60
    6) 60
    7) 60
    8) 53

    Reply
  24. Felix

    MacBook Pro
    15-inch, Late 2011
    Processor: 2.2 GHz Intel Core i7
    Graphics: Intel HD Graphics 3000 512 MB
    Software: OS X 10.9

    Everything running at 60fps when ran on both Mavericks and Windows 7 Ultimate through bootcamp :stars:

    Reply
  25. Brian

    1. 60fps
    2. 59fps
    3. 40fps
    4. 47fps
    5. 60fps
    6. 59fps
    7. 60fps
    8. 49fps

    laptop
    processor: intel i5-2410m 2.3GHz

    Reply
  26. Mattihew

    I don’t know a lot about my laptop, but I do know that I have an Intel i5 core with 2.5GHz and 3210M.
    My frame rates are:
    -Vector low quality: 60 fps
    -Vector medium quality: Around 39-43 fps
    -Vector high quality: Around 26-28 fps
    -Vector high quality (optimized): 32 fps
    -Bitmapped no smoothing: 60 fps
    -Bitmapped with smoothing: 41 fps
    -HD bitmapped no smoothing: 60 fps
    -HD bitmapped with smoothing: Around 33-37 fps

    So for me it doesn’t matter what you do, I’d play on low quality anyway :yay:

    Reply
  27. Nicrodk

    My specs are on a laptop : i7 3630QM clocked at 2,4 GHz allowed to hit 120% though 4 cores 8 threads and i have intel HD Graphics 4000 with a GeForce GTX 660M 2GB

    vector, low qual : 60 fps
    vector, medium qual : 60 fps
    vector, high qual : 60 fps
    vector, high qual optimised : 60 fps
    bitmap, no smoothing : 60 fps
    bitmap, with smoothing : 60 fps
    HD bitmap, no msoothing : 60 fps
    HD bitmap, with smoothing 60 fps

    and do bear in mind i had fb and kongregate frontpage open plus steam and skype (not that i think they take that much but still)

    greets Nicrodk ^^

    Reply
  28. Allan

    tried it agian on my laptop: core i3-3217U @1.8GHz with Intel HD Graphics 4000

    mode 1: 60
    mode 2: 46
    mode 3: 30
    mode 4: 35
    mode 5: 60
    mode 6: 39
    mode 7: 60
    mode 8: 33

    Reply
  29. Chompey

    AMD Phenom II X4 965: 3.4 Ghz quad-core.

    1. 60 FPS
    2. 60 FPS
    3. 40 FPS
    4. 49 FPS
    5. 60 FPS
    6. 60 FPS
    7. 60 FPS
    8. 47 FPS

    Reply
  30. Allan

    I have a core i7-2600K @ 3.4GHz with a very old ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT video card.

    60 Fps in every mode in Chrome (plus had many other programs running).
    Then tried it in Internet Explorer (with it still running in Chrome) and still got 60 Fps in all modes.
    The tried it in FireFox (with it still running in Chrome and IE) and got 60 Fps in all modes except mode 3 where it was 48.

    Closed down your test in IE and Chrome (but still had about 20 other tabs open), then FireFox got all 60 Fps too…

    So, looking good here! 🙂

    Reply
  31. Stanning

    Desktop

    Intel Core i3-2100 3.10GHZ, 3100 Mhz, 2core, 4 logic

    1: 60
    2: 60
    3: 45
    4: 54
    5: 60
    6: 60
    7: 60
    8: 55

    Reply
  32. terminologicalInexactitude

    60, 30, 20, 22, 60, 30, 60, 25

    Hardware:
    Intel Penitum CPU b950 @2.10GHz
    4 GB RAM
    64-bit OS

    Reply
  33. Crimzn

    AMD Phenom(tm) II X6 1055T 2.8GHz

    1) 60fps
    2) 60fps
    3) 48-50fps
    4) 58-60fps
    5) 60fps
    6) 60fps
    7) 60fps
    8) 60fps

    Reply
  34. metallica_dillon

    I did this test with youtube playing music on a playlist in the background. Also gonna try without the music after I do a full one with. I am using a toshiba satellite laptop with the basic specs. It hasn’t been upgraded at all and is almost a year old now. It has also never been cleaned of viruses or anything, which I’m sure it probably has.
    1: 60 fps stable
    2: 60 fps stable
    3: back and forth between 59 and 60 fps. usually on 60 fps.
    4: same as 3.
    5: 60 fps stable
    6: same as 3 and 4.
    7: 60 fps stable
    8: same as 3, 4, and 6.

    Seeing as how I got perfect or almost perfect fps with music playing in the background on a constantly loading youtube playlist, I think I will get all perfect without. Not gonna waste time checking. XD

    Reply
  35. Spencer

    Intel i7 860 @ 2.9 GHz
    ATI HD Radeon 4650
    6 GB DDR 3 RAM
    Browser: Chrome 31.0.1650.57

    1. 43 fps
    2. 25 fps
    3. 15 fps
    4. 18 fps
    5. 60 fps
    6. 24 fps
    7. 60 fps
    8. 20 fps

    Reply
  36. This_One

    low: 36
    med: 22
    High: 16
    VG High Optimized: 15/19
    bitmapped no smoothing: 60
    bitmapped smoothing 16
    HD bitmapped no smoothing: 56
    HD bitmaped smoothing: 15
    Laptop; windows 7; AMD E-350 1600 Mhz, 2 core; 4 gigs of RAM

    Reply
  37. Naraxis

    Desktop
    3.6 Ghz Quad Core
    1: 60fps
    2: 58fps
    3: 35fps
    4: 42fps
    5: 60fps
    6: 53fps
    7: 60fps
    8: 43fps

    Results may be slightly lower than normal, my computer hasn’t been restarted for a couple days and has been rendering videos in it’s uptime. I’ll test again tomorrow after I restart but it may be useful for you to know how pc’s perform when they’re “tired”.

    Reply
  38. Sephtis

    AMD triple core 2.5/core

    1. 60
    2. 47
    3. 29
    4. 34
    5. 60
    6. 47-54 (lots of fluctuating here)
    7. 60
    8. 38-40 (rises then falls, repeat forever)

    Reply
  39. tribaljet

    Intel Core i7-2820QM running at 3.1GHz

    Test performance numbers:
    1 – 60 fps
    2 – 58 fps
    3 – 40 fps
    4 – 46 fps
    5 – 60 fps
    6 – 60 fps
    7 – 60 fps
    8 – 52 fps

    Do contact me if further details are required. And good luck with EBF4’s full release :thumbsup:

    Reply
  40. Deaditslife

    Probably not much help;
    but they all run at a solid 60-FPS :yay:

    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570
    Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600K CPU @ 3.40GHz (8 CPUs), ~3.7GHz
    16 GB RAM DDR3

    Firefox 25.0.1 :stars:

    Reply
  41. Eric Kim

    60 fps on all

    Windows 7 64 bit
    Xeon Processor 2.50GHz (24CPUs), ~2.5GHz
    24576MB RAM
    DirectX 11

    Nvidia Quadro 4000
    1920 x 1200 (current resolution)

    Reply
  42. KazrielEversio

    60 FPS all around.

    I’m using an AMD FX-8120 Eight-Core processor, 3.5 Gigahertz, Unlocked and overclocked to 3.6 ten-core.

    Desktop.

    Reply
  43. Supertails

    1: 60fps
    2: 57fps
    3: 36fps
    4: 42fps
    5: 60fps
    6: 52fps
    7: 60fps
    8: 43fps

    CPU: AMD Athlon II X4 640T, quad-core, clock speed = 3.0GHz, desktop computer

    Looking forward to this so much! :love:

    Reply
  44. Tikikala

    I dont know how to see other stuff that’s not CPU
    Low quality: 60 FPS, CPU: 6-11%
    Medium: 57-60FPS, CPU: 75-83%
    High: 30-42FPS, CPU: ~77-81%
    High Optimal: ~21FPS, ~77-81%
    Bitmap no smoothing: 60FPS, 80-9x%
    Bitmap with smoothing: 38-42FPS, 84-87%
    HD Bitmap no smoothing: 60FPS, 86-92%
    HD bitmap with smoothing: 25-29FPS, 82-85%

    No I don’t even have steam, but I’m just doing this to help. email me or pm me on kong if you need further info.

    Reply
  45. TheBadEnd

    Desktop, I don’t know specifics but it runs games alright.
    1. 45fps 2. 30fps 3. 20fps 4. 22fps 5. 60fps 6. 25fps 7. 60fps
    Hoped I helped in some way, really looking forward to this. :stars:

    Reply
  46. Anthony

    my hardware:

    CPU: Intel core i3 370M
    2 cores; 4 threads @ core speed of 2400 mHz

    tests:
    1. 60 fps
    2. 48 fps
    3. 31 fps
    4. 36 fps
    5. 60 fps

    hope this helps :shades:

    Reply
  47. Le Fudge

    Vector graphics (Low): Avg. of 21 FPS.
    ” ” (Medium): Avg of 10.
    ” ” (High): Avg. of 4.
    ” ” High-optimized– Avg. of 3.

    Bitmapped w/o smoothing–42.
    ” ” With smoothing–12.
    HD Bitmapped w/o smoothing– Avg of 39.
    ” ” With smoothing–10.

    Using a toaster(Laptop) with a 1ghz quad-core.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *